The Social Construction of Climate Change Adaptation Finance for: Epistemological, Methodological and Ontological Challenges to the Provision of Adequate and Predictable Climate Change Adaptation Financing that is New and Additional
| dc.Advisor | Dr Mark Bynoe | |
| dc.DegreeType | Doctor of Philosophy | |
| dc.Department | Institute of International Relations | |
| dc.Faculty | Faculty of Social Sciences | |
| dc.Institution | University of the West Indies (Saint Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Best, Gary | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-24T18:43:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-24T18:43:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-06-28 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this research is to provide the small island developing states (SIDS) with an empirical understanding of key characteristics within the United Nations Climate Finance Mechanism and among its members that would enable more informed decisions and negotiating positions towards accessing climate change adaptation finance. Grounded in international relations theory, and the use of a multi method qualitative study with a sample of key informants triangulated with documentary information, the researcher explored the perception that actions of members contribute to the provision of inadequate and unpredictable climate finance that is not new and additional, despite an obligation and commitment by developed country Parties to raise USD 100 bn from 2020, towards that goal. The data collection methods used were in depth semi-structured interviews, document review, supported by genealogy. Thirty-one findings emerged from an analysis of the coded data. Key findings included: (1) financialization of climate change solutions is detrimental to the SIDS; (2) there is no new and additional finance; (3) doubts surround the AOSIS as an effective negotiator; (4) more adaptation and mainstreaming are needed; and (5) adaptation is not seen as an investible product. The findings were analysed using a Foucauldian influenced discourse analysis and genealogy; a Ruggie inspired constructivism; and cross-case analysis, which confirmed that power was exercised, inter alia, through decision texts, influenced by the construction of dominant discourses that produced ruptures and disjunctures in the climate finance discourse. We concluded that market-based mechanisms, as a means of raising climate finance for the SIDS, are likely to fail and recommended instead, the provision of public and grant-based sources via direct transfers to programmatic activities within national budgets. | |
| dc.format | Text | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2139/56448 | |
| dc.subject.other | Constructivism and international regimes | |
| dc.subject.other | Dominant discourse and textual power | |
| dc.subject.other | Financialization of climate finance | |
| dc.subject.other | Justice and climate finance | |
| dc.subject.other | Mainstreaming adaptation in developing states | |
| dc.subject.other | New and additional climate finance | |
| dc.subject.other | Post structuralism; | |
| dc.subject.other | Uncertainties in climate finance | |
| dc.title | The Social Construction of Climate Change Adaptation Finance for: Epistemological, Methodological and Ontological Challenges to the Provision of Adequate and Predictable Climate Change Adaptation Financing that is New and Additional | |
| dc.type | Thesis |