Informed consent practices for surgical care at university teaching hospitals: a case in a low resource setting

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorOchieng, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorIbingira, Charles
dc.contributor.authorBuwembo, William
dc.contributor.authorMunabi, Ian
dc.contributor.authorKiryowa, Haruna
dc.contributor.authorKitara, David
dc.contributor.authorBukuluki, Paul
dc.contributor.authorNzarubara, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorMwaka, Erisa
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-24T15:10:44Z
dc.date.available2014-06-24T15:10:44Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-19
dc.date.updated2014-06-24T15:10:46Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Informed consent in medical practice is essential and a global standard that should be sought at all the times doctors interact with patients. Its intensity would vary depending on the invasiveness and risks associated with the anticipated treatment. To our knowledge there has not been any systematic review of consent practices to document best practices and identify areas that need improvement in our setting. The objective of the study was to evaluate the informed consent practices of surgeons at University teaching Hospitals in a low resource setting. Methods A cross-sectional study conducted at three university teaching hospitals in Uganda. Self-guided questionnaires were left at a central location in each of the surgical departments after verbally communicating to the surgeons of the intention of the study. Filled questionnaires were returned at the same location by the respondents for collection by the research team. In addition, 20 in-depth interviews were held with surgeons and a review of 384 patientsand#8217; record files for informed consent documentation was done. Results A total of 132 (62.1%) out of 214 questionnaires were completed and returned. Respondents were intern doctors, residents and specialists from General surgery, Orthopedic surgery, Ear, Nose and Throat, Ophthalmology, Dentistry, Obstetrics and Gynaecology departments. The average working experience of respondents was 4.8and#160;years (SD 4.454, range 0and#8211;39 years). 48.8% of the respondents said they obtained consent all the time surgery is done while 51.2% did not obtain consent all the time. Many of the respondents indicated that informed consent was not obtained by the surgeon who operated the patient but was obtained either at admission or by nurses in the surgical units. The consent forms used in the hospitals were found to be inadequate and many times signed at admission before diagnosing the patientand#8217;s disease. Conclusions Informed consent administration and documentation for surgical health care is still inadequate at University teaching hospitals in Uganda.
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.identifier.citationBMC Medical Ethics. 2014 May 19;15(1):40
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-40
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2139/38581
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderJoseph Ochieng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.titleInformed consent practices for surgical care at university teaching hospitals: a case in a low resource setting
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1472-6939-15-40.xml
Size:
44.57 KB
Format:
Extensible Markup Language
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1472-6939-15-40.pdf
Size:
167.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1472-6939-15-40-S1.doc
Size:
29.5 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1472-6939-15-40-S2.doc
Size:
24.5 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

BioMed Central